Japonica
Protects Top Quartile Hurdle Rate Intellectual Property
----Entrepreneurial
Co-Investment Structure Offers Granular Stratification of Relative
Performance--
Dateline:
Providence, Rhode Island USA, November 16, 2005
Japonica
Partners protects its Top Quartile Hurdle Rate Intellectual Property
by filing a utility patent with the United States Patent and Trademark
Office.
Japonica’s patent-pending structure offers co-investors
alternatives at a granular level of stratification relative to
performance benchmarks.
“The
co-investment structure bases investment manager compensation
solely on excess profits, actually cultivating entrepreneurial
returns,” commented Japonica Partners Founder & Managing
Director Paul B. Kazarian. “In particular, the best entrepreneurial
investment managers, singularly focused on achieving excess profit
with respect to a top quartile benchmark, excel with the co-investment
structure.”
Japonica’s patent-pending structure is an entrepreneurial
solution to the conundrum faced by pioneering portfolio managers
in identifying top quartile investment managers and linking pay
to performance.
“Success
in the marketplace is indicia of non-obviousness,” commented
George Chaclas, an intellectual property attorney with Boston-based
Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP. “The patent office
will consider commercial success during its examination.”
Japonica’s
patent is titled “Co-Investment Structure with Multi-Option
Hurdle Rate Alternatives for Performance Based Asset Allocation.”
About
Japonica Partners
Japonica Partners is an entrepreneurial co-investment firm
that makes concentrated investments in underperforming global
large caps, providing entrepreneurial returns for accomplished
money managers who succeed with top quartile performance.
For
more information contact:
Chet Hollister
Principal
Japonica Partners
401.861.6160
chollister@japonica.com
Japonica Partners is a Delaware, U.S.A.,
company. |
This document is for informational
purposes only. This is NOT a solicitation of funds, |
nor should it be construed as such.
This does NOT constitute an offer, nor the solicitation |
of an offer. |
|